Gun control
Why is it so important?
Let us look at the facts.
Please buckle your seat belts &
hang on to your jaw for this one.
For the Lion will say what no one will.
The real truth about "gun control".
Banker is behind the government.
In 1938 all higher judges, top attorney and the US attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what they were told, “US is a bankrupt nation. It is completely owned by its creditors. The creditors own Congress, they own the Executives, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State Governments.”
Talk about selling your soul to the devil!
You wonder why things are as they are? Your courts and the coporate US government are operating under admiralty jurisdiction.
[Incase you missed the History - False Flag page look below for proof.]
What does that have to do with gun control?
EVERYTHING!
BANKERS DO NOT WANT TO ADMIT THAT THEY OWN EVERYTHING AND COULD FORECLOSE ON EVERY NATION IN THE WORLD. THE REASON THEY DON’T TELL ANYONE OR EVERYONE IS BECAUSE THERE ARE STILL FAR TOO MANY PRIVATELY OWN GUNS ESPECIALLY IN THE US.
Thus gun control has NOTHING to do with “sports”, “hunting” and the “real crime” most never had any part of.
Gun owners obey the laws.
Thank God for them!
Do you want to know what the "change" is?
It is not a secret any more.
Now you know who "US" is.
Not so "angelic" as they want you to think.
The National Rifle Association was formed in 1871 by Union veterans of the Civil War who were disappointed in the basic shooting skills of Union soldiers during the war, and who wanted to increase the marksmanship ability of soldiers. It’s a simple historical fact that the National Rifle Association has been training National Guardsmen to shoot for more than 140 years. That’s longer than the modern National Guard (formed under the Dick Act, or Militia Act of 1903) has existed.
Does anyone realize that laws are not made to stop crime? If that were the case, there would be no arson, no theft, no rape, no DUIs, etc. Laws provide a recourse. Without laws, there are no criminals. Laws are a pragmatic way for society to deal with action we, as a whole, find inappropriate. They have never STOPPED crime. They give us the means with which to deal with the criminal.
Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. Criminals love gun control -- it makes their jobs safer. None are more criminal than the government.
Assault is a behavior, not a device.
Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
If you don't know your rights you don't have any. "Free" men do not ask permission to bear arms. With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
Facts;
There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is not disputed. The U.S. population is 324,059,091 as of June 22, 2016. Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective as compared to other causes of death:
• 65% of those deaths are by suicide, which would never be prevented by gun laws.
• 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified.
• 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill persons – better known as gun violence.
• 3% are accidental discharge deaths.
So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100. Still too many? Now lets look at how those deaths spanned across the nation.
• 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
• 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
• 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
• 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root cause.
This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75 deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but understand, it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if all cities and states are not created equal, then there must be something other than the tool causing the gun deaths.
Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths? All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault are all done by criminals. It is ludicrous to think that criminals will obey laws. That is why they are called criminals.
But what about other deaths each year?
• 40,000+ die from a drug overdose–THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
• 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun deaths.
• 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities(exceeding gun deaths even if you include suicide).
Now it gets good:
• 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical errors. You are safer walking in the worst areas of Chicago than you are when you are in a hospital!
• 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It’s time to stop the double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If the liberal loons and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total number of gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides ................ Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions! So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns? It's pretty simple:
Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs. So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed."
It is not so much control to the US government, but to the bankers. The US is and has been bankrupt since 1930s. Bankers CAN NOT foreclose on the nation as long as the people are armed.
During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million people were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. Remember HISTORY REPEATS!
FEMA Camps do exist.
Worse than that, if the US sinks, it provides aid to the tune of —$19 billion in economic assistance to 184 countries and $14.2 billion in military assistance to 142 countries, that is 96% of all countries.
Even worse than that! China has the second largest economy in the world—and is a major buyer of U.S. debt. So we borrow money from China in order to give them financial assistance?
SEP 15, 2016 - The United States and Israel made a new 10-year deal. The pact, laid out in a Memorandum of Understanding, will be worth $38 billion. according to the Congressional Research Service, “the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. foreign assistance since World War II.”
What do you think will happen to Israel if the US bans guns on it's soil and the bankers move in and take everything away from everyone?
Despite his notoriously cold relationship with Israeli, Barack Obama did this.
How crazy is all that?
Diana Loesch Calls out Mainstream media
They love mass shootings – white mothers.
Where was CNN when children in gun free cities like Chicago get killed?
Where is CNN when folks are killed by someone in the country illegally?
Where is CNN for sanctuary cities?
Please understand it is not that they don't care about black people. It is that it doesn't fit their agenda of getting rid of guns. You see Chicago is already a gun free zone. If they cried about anyone being shot there then they would have to admit that banning guns doesn't work. They don't want to do that. Everyone knows there is no crime in Chicago that's why they don't have guns.
===== ===== ====== =====
Dr. Phil just made sense. Better make the schools safer because the second amendment is not going anywhere. Amen!
A deranged student with a rifle had no problem getting into a school. A student with a Bible would have been stopped immediately.
Democrats love mass murder, because they are the ones committing them. Every shooter going back to Columbine aligned with the Democrat party.
She's totally right the media craves for mass shootings, so they can blame the NRA for it instead of individual or people who did it, but when illegal immigration killed Kate Steinle in San Francisco not once did they blame the gun oh he had mental problems.
Damn Dana... I guess that's what happens when you attack a woman with more balls than the entire Democratic party.
In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States .
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States .
In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX .
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US ...
In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis .
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown , CT.
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.
SOLUTION: It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns." - James L. Taylor
All that aside,
the absolute truth
of the matter is this;
